This is the form for team X.
Hardware
Basic design includes items such as the number and
position of drive wheels, number and position of drive motors, transmission
configuration, number and position of sensors, etc. It does not include
realization of these design items in Lego.
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appropriate for implementation:
(How well does the basic design lend itself to
being implemented with the robot kits you were provided?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appropriate for software development:
(How well does the basic design lend itself to
straightforward software development using IC?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Suited to task:
(How well suited is the basic design to the
task the robot is to accomplish?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Design Realization:
(How well was the basic design translated into
the Lego and electronics available in your robotics kit?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Overall Score for Hardware:
(The overall score in not intended to be
a mere average of the above scores. You are encouraged to weight these
factors and others as you choose. If you use factors not considered above,
please comment on them below.)
Comments on Hardware (at least one):
Software
Basic design includes items such as programming
paradigm chosen (functional, procedural, object-oriented, logic, etc.),
robotic paradigm (functional modules, behavior-based, ad-hoc, etc.),
abstract data structures, etc. It does not include realization of these
design items in IC.
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appropriate for implementation:
(How well does the basic design lend itself to
being implemented in IC using the robot kits you were provided?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appropriate for hardware development:
(How well does the basic design lend itself to
straightforward hardware development using the robot kits?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Suited to task:
(How well suited is the basic design to the
task the robot is to accomplish?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Design Realization:
(How well was the basic design translated into
IC?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Overall Score for Software:
(The overall score in not intended to be
a mere average of the above scores. You are encouraged to weight these
factors and others as you choose. If you use factors not considered above,
please comment on them below.)
Comments on Software (at least one):
Integration
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Hardware and Software Appropriately Matched:
(Did the approach pursued in hardware match
well with the approach pursued in software?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appropriate Testing
(Does the testing seem appropriate?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Successful Demonstration
(How successful was the robot
demonstration?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Overall Score for Integration:
(The overall score in not intended to be
a mere average of the above scores. You are encouraged to weight these
factors and others as you choose. If you use factors not considered above,
please comment on them below.)
Comments on Integration (at least one):
Documentation
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Hardware Documentation:
(Was the hardware documentation complete,
well-organized, understandable, etc.?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Software Documentation
(Was the software documentation complete,
well-organized, understandable, etc., including comments and formatting of
code?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Team Organization Evaluation and Plans Documentation
(Was the team organization evaluation and plans
documentation complete, well-organized, understandable, etc.?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Presentation Documentation
(Was the presentation documentation complete,
well-organized, understandable, etc.?)
No response
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Overall Score for Documentation:
(The overall score in not intended to be
a mere average of the above scores. You are encouraged to weight these
factors and others as you choose. If you use factors not considered above,
please comment on them below.)
Comments on Documentation (at least one):